This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
These include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the False Claims Act, and other legislation that governs patient care, billing practices, and safety standards. Risk Management: Healthcare organizations face numerous risks, from malpractice claims to cybersecurity threats.
Click Here for OCR’s guidance “ How the HIPAA Rules Permit Covered Health Care Providers and Health Plans to Use Remote Communication Technologies for Audio-Only Telehealth ” Comply with Consent Requirements Most states have telehealth specific informedconsent requirement in their statute, administrative code and/or Medicaid policies.
While the laws governing telehealth were becoming gradually more permissive, progress was slow. diminished quality of care, increased opportunity to violate scope of practice or informedconsent laws, etc.) seem not to have been a major concern.
Professional Regulation The Guardians of Professional Knowledge Early in the second Trump administration, health information started to disappear from government websites including those maintained by the CDC and NIH. Here, too, medical malpractice law provides a useful lens. Florida (known popularly as the Docs v.
professional licensing, informedconsent, malpractice liability, and fiduciary duties) while these guardrails run counter to the presumed equality of speakers outside of this relationship. The premise is that individuals within the professional relationship are protected by a variety of legal guardrails (e.g.,
Professionals within a professional relationship are subject to a variety of legal constraints, such as informedconsent requirements or professional malpractice liability if things go wrong. For example, free speech is not a defense against a malpractice claim. As the Court reaffirmed in Shurtleff , “[t]he Constitution.
over Claims Practices Where things stand in Central California 1 month after a community hospital’s closure California hospital names Kelly Linden CEO Upcoming California health bills to watch, including a conversation with Rep. million to UMass Memorial Health Care for COVID-19 costs Four Mass.
Heart transplant expert witnesses are typically sought after in medical malpractice cases involving heart transplant procedures. In addition to malpractice cases, heart transplant expert witnesses may also be called upon in cases related to organ procurement and allocation, informedconsent, and regulatory compliance.
There was an insufficient time to discuss the Torts: Medical Malpractice draft. Ironically, this last motion also corrected a series of typos in the Draft’s black letter – substituting “regimen” for “regime,” and pointing out that “The primary definition of a regime is a government, especially an authoritarian one.”
Today’s post is actually about a medical malpractice case. Within days, the hospital convened a “power morcellation group” tasked with drafting an informedconsent form that would reflect the FDA’s concerns. In Rivera v. Valley Hospital, Inc. 2022 WL 3650726 (NJ Aug.
Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informedconsent” and caused them “emotional distress. 23 in its current form. at 183 (quoting Meyers v. 2d 398, 404 (N.J.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content