Remove FDA Remove Informed Consent Remove Malpractice
article thumbnail

Health Provider News – February 10, 2023

Hall Render

over Claims Practices Where things stand in Central California 1 month after a community hospital’s closure California hospital names Kelly Linden CEO Upcoming California health bills to watch, including a conversation with Rep. Blue Shield of California is counting on it.

article thumbnail

Med-Mal Plaintiff Expert Standard of Care Opinion Unnecessary Due to FDA Warnings

Drug & Device Law

Of course, on the defense side, we’re usually as happy as clams if we can show that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already decided which warnings are necessary, so let’s call it a day. Francisco is an unpublished, nonprecedential opinion about a medical malpractice, not product liability, case. 2023 WL 3589654 (Ariz.

FDA 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Dentists As Product Manufacturers?  Bet On It In Nevada

Drug & Device Law

The patient sadly passed away after having 23 teeth removed and replaced (for those keeping score, that is more than two-thirds of a normal human complement of teeth), and his family sued for medical malpractice and product liability. So maybe the manufacturer’s duty to warn and the physician’s duty to obtain informed consent merge.

article thumbnail

FDA Safety Communication Not Enough to Support Punitive Damages Claim in New Jersey

Drug & Device Law

Today’s post is actually about a medical malpractice case. But it involves the interplay between an FDA “Safety Communication” and punitive damages, so we thought it was worth looking at. The FDA data showed that approximately.28% Notably, the FDA Communication was not enough. In Rivera v. Valley Hospital, Inc.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Suing the Certifiers – A Dangerous Undertaking

Drug & Device Law

Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. Such power rests solely with the FDA.”

Doctors 52
article thumbnail

No DTC Advertising Exception to Learned Intermediary Rule in Washington

Drug & Device Law

Plaintiff argued this conflicted with the learned intermediary rule because the FDA requires warnings to consumers when manufacturers market drugs to consumers. The FDA also requires warnings to physicians. Doctors are charged with discussing the risks and benefits of treatment and obtaining informed consent from their patients.

Doctors 69
article thumbnail

Confident Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

They’re experienced at what they do and aren’t intimidated by plaintiffs’ counsel and their threats of malpractice claims if they don’t testify the way plaintiffs want them to. procedure that existed at the time of [plaintiff’s] injury”; malpractice was “intervening cause”) (applying Kansas law); Eck v. 3d 1223, 1233 (11th Cir.

FDA 59