This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The use of AI is revolutionizing the delivery of healthcare, but its use comes with significant ethical challenges that cannot be ignored, the most important of which involve bias and informedconsent. . Another major ethical concern of AI use surrounds the principle of informedconsent. Overall Recommendations .
Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) released draft guidance regarding the conduct of decentralized clinical trials (“DCTs”) for drugs, biological products and devices. This draft guidance expands on previous FDA recommendations released in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recent statements by the FDA and EMA support this emphasis, calling out the need for education and training of all constituents in a clinical trial to reduce unwanted protocol deviations and improve overall quality in clinical trial operations. Improving Protocol Compliance.
Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) finalized “ InformedConsent: Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors ” (“Final Guidance”), following the FDA’s earlier issuance of draft guidance on the subject in July 2014. On August 15, 2023, the U.S.
China Regulatory Roundup: Latest Guidelines for Medical Device and IVD Compliance, 17 March 2022. For Investigator Sites, the subject areas are Organizational Aspects, InformedConsent of Trial Participants, Review of Trial Participant Data, and Management of Investigational Medicinal Product(s).
Of interest is a reference to the FDA’s draft document “Computer Software Assurance for Production and Quality System Software,” which was recently published on 13 September 2022. PCPC looks forward to working with the FDA and key stakeholders to implement this important legislation.
Ownership and protection of data are paramount, with compliance issues such as HIPAA regulations adding complexity. Questions surrounding the sharing of proprietary information and the risk of algorithmic compromise or manipulation heighten ethical concerns. This creates the opportunity for bias related to location.
Since the FDA requires pre-approval of any warnings about off-label uses, preemption at some point should have been pre-ordained under the Mensing ( 2011+1 ) independence principle, but off-label use did not really figure in Zofran ’s analysis. The FDA’s five reviews of teratogenic risk all came to the same conclusion.
The FDA regulates medical devices, including 3d-printed medical devices when made by medical device manufacturers (see here for more information). The FDA, or state-level regulatory commissions, or plaintiffs’ attorneys applying tort law, or all of the above? There is no intermediary!
Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informedconsent” and caused them “emotional distress. So if compliance with an industry standard is a defense, this plaintiff went a step further and sued the organizations that created the standards. has no power to enforce compliance”), aff’d , 405 F.
The last provision cited by plaintiff’s side was one that allows the fact finder to consider evidence of compliance with regulations. Plaintiff argued this conflicted with the learned intermediary rule because the FDA requires warnings to consumers when manufacturers market drugs to consumers. In fact, he is legally not allowed to.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content