This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As a centralized hub of critical practitioner data, the NPDB serves as a powerful ally in provider credentialing , helping hospitals, medical boards, and institutions verify backgrounds, track malpractice claims, and ensure regulatory compliance. What Is the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)?
This includes verifying education, residency, employment history, malpractice insurance, hospital privileges, and board certifications. It plays a key role in reducing malpractice risks, preventing fraud, and verifying that healthcare professionals have the necessary training and clinical experience to perform their duties.
Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law In a possibly precedent-setting case, on November 9, 2022, for the first time, an appeals court in New Jersey ruled that plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases do not need an affidavit of merit to file claims against a [.] Indest III, J.D.,
The longer the pandemic continues, the more obvious it is how effective the sweeping federal and state laws shielding medical providers from malpractice associated with COVID-19 have been. Absent fraud, after damages are awarded, plaintiffs cannot reopen their suits to reflect greater-than-expected future harm. By Jennifer S.
Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law In a possibly precedent-setting case, on November 9, 2022, for the first time, an appeals court in New Jersey ruled that plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases do not need an affidavit of merit to file claims against a [.] Indest III, J.D.,
Earlier this year, an in-depth OIG investigation resulted in a six-day trial of a former Louisiana health clinic CEO , who was ultimately convicted of Medicaid fraud and sentenced to 82 months in federal prison. This ensures that medical facilities are not engaging in malpractice and following program rules and regulations.
This list includes individuals convicted of healthcare fraud, patient abuse, or other serious violations. Would you want a provider whos been disbarred due to patient abuse or malpractice providing your care? Working with individuals and entities on the exclusion list also vastly compromises patient safety. We wouldnt either.
This includes verifying education, residency, employment history, malpractice insurance, hospital privileges, and board certifications. It plays a key role in reducing malpractice risks, preventing fraud, and verifying that healthcare professionals have the necessary training and clinical experience to perform their duties.
In this quick guide, we’ll explore the importance of including NPDB monitoring in your routine license and exclusion monitoring to protect your organization and the patients you serve from fraud, waste, and abuse. Its mission is to enhance healthcare quality, defend the public, and decrease healthcare fraud and misuse in the U.S.
Here’s how these plans help limit liability: Prevent Fraud and Abuse: Compliance plans include measures to prevent fraud and abuse within the healthcare organization. Reduce Medical Malpractice Risk: Ensuring patient safety is a fundamental component of compliance plans.
This confidential clearinghouse primarily aims to safeguard public interest and healthcare quality while reducing fraud and abuse. Health organizations must complete National Practitioner Data Bank or NPDB credentialing to maintain compliance with federal regulations.
Here are seven red flags to look out for and the reasons why: Incomplete or inconsistent application: Missing or conflicting data regarding education, training, work history, licensure, or malpractice history might indicate false information or attempts to conceal relevant details.
In this blog, we’ll discuss the two processes and key differences between provider enrollment and credentialing. The employer may also review any pending and past medical malpractice cases or disciplinary actions. This helps uphold quality healthcare standards and protects against fraud, waste, and abuse.
By validating staff competence, it reduces the likelihood of malpractice claims and legal issues. This process reduces the risk of fraud and ensures accuracy. It also involves checking for any disciplinary actions or malpractice history. There are also checks for malpractice history and criminal background.
This creates the potential for adverse patient outcomes, leading to expensive malpractice lawsuits. However, an even better source is an aggregated dataset such as Verisys’ FACIS (Fraud Abuse Control Information System). Thorough and ongoing provider screening is critical to avoid costly negligent credentialing and malpractice claims.
Written by: Nancie Lee Cummins, CFE, CHA, CIFHA, OHCC, CHCM, CHCO, CORCM Due to the high volume of fraud schemes involving telemarketing revealed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) over recent years, it is important that providers heed “buyer beware” when engaging with a telemarketing firm. “If If it is too good to be true it probably isn't.”
Clinical Risks: These are associated with patient care and can include malpractice claims, costs of corrective procedures, and increased insurance premiums resulting from adverse patient outcomes. Financial Risks: They encompass losses from billing errors, fraud, and abuse claims, or failed investments related to healthcare provisions.
It involves collecting and reviewing information such as education, training, licensure, certifications, work history, malpractice history, and references — all in pursuit of verifying that providers are who they say they are and qualified to deliver legitimate, safe, and ethical care.
Verisys’ proprietary dataset, Fraud Abuse Control Information System (FACIS) , is the largest and most comprehensive dataset for screening allied health and medical providers. As a credentialing verification organization , Verisys has a variety of solutions that can meet your organization’s credentialing needs. With over 5.5
Additionally, the credentialing specialist may request a record of any pending and past medical malpractice cases and disciplinary actions from the appropriate authority. Maintaining compliance helps protect against fraud, waste, and abuse. Upon completion and approval, the provider can begin billing for medical services.
This reduces the risk of fraud, supports adherence to industry regulations, and safeguards against legal and financial repercussions. By maintaining precise records, healthcare organizations can prevent errors in referrals, reduce the risk of malpractice, and ensure patients receive care from qualified professionals.
Many healthcare employers utilize FACIS (Fraud Abuse Control Information System), offered by Verisys, to screen for any sanctions, exclusions, or disciplinary actions at the federal and state levels. This step ensures that healthcare organizations hire qualified professionals with clean records.
Please note that the potential for ulterior financial motives does not automatically presume that the intent is somehow suspect, in the same way that potential medical malpractice concerns does not legitimately question the clinical motives of all other providers.
The policy issuer for malpractice insurance verifies insurance coverage. As compliance requirements change to keep up with ever-evolving, accelerating fraud schemes and high expectations for quality care and outcomes, they place increasing demands on healthcare facilities. Credentials Verification Organizations to the Rescue?
NATIONAL 94% of Organizations Experienced a Cyberattack in 2022 AHA blog: Strengthening crisis management in rural health care Biden signs bill ending Covid-19 national emergency Cancer drug shortages are creating dire circumstances for some patients CMS Releases FY24 IPPS Proposed Rule, Seeks to Boost Rates by 2.8%
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content