This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In Drugs and the FDA: Safety, Efficacy, and the Public’s Trust , oncologist Mikkael A. Sekeres centers his narrative on the controversial 2011 Avastin hearings , in which the FDA reconsidered and ultimately withdrew the breast cancer indication for Genentech’s Avastin drug. By Matthew Chun.
US Legal Requirements for Quantum-Powered Medical Devices In the United States, some quantum-powered medical devices may be governed under the existing FDA regulatory framework. Foster Institutional Plasticity: Evolve institutions like the FDA and EMA to accommodate quantum technologies.
Dmitry’s talk, “Evergreening: The FDA’s Role in the Creation of Balanced Rights for Pharmaceutical Improvements,” was developed into an article and published in the Iowa Law Review in 2019 titled “The More Things Change: Improvement Patents, Drug Modifications, and the FDA.”
What do a MacArthur Genius award winner, several health law professors at top schools, executive directors of leading health law centers, an associate chief counsel of the FDA, and partners and associates at top health care law firms all have in common? The Petrie-Flom Center Student Fellowship !
FDA Approval. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which “ regulates the sale of medical device products (including diagnostic tests) in the U.S. ” Although it is questionable whether the FDA would ever approve the Sarco machine as a medical device, it turns out the FDA may not need to. .”
PROM responses can be used for purposes of clinical care, research, quality improvement, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of drugs and devices, and even insurance reimbursement. Hahn Professor of Law, Professor of Bioethics, and Co-Director of Law-Medicine Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
These five students are a fantastic cohort of health law policy, biotechnology, and bioethics scholars who join us from across Harvard. Sarah Gabriele is a second year Master of Bioethics candidate at Harvard Medical School. We are excited to welcome a new group of Student Fellows to the Petrie-Flom Center family. Louis (USA).
These five students are a fantastic cohort of health law policy, biotechnology, and bioethics scholars who join us from Harvard Law School. His current research focuses on tensions between the patent incentive system, the FDA approval process, and insurance carriers. Vincent Joralemon is a law student (J.D.
2025) is Assistant Professor at Brown University’s Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and a master’s candidate at Harvard Medical School’s Center for Bioethics. Her research interests include genetics, environmental health sciences, novel biotechnologies, and the FDA regulatory process. Zain Khalid (M.B.E Jessica Samuels (J.D./MPH
To navigate the myriad interests and stakes involved in creating federal psychedelic policy, the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School convened a virtual panel discussion with three leading psychedelic policy advocates. By James R. A full video of the event is available below.
US Legal Requirements for Quantum-Powered Medical Devices In the United States, some quantum-powered medical devices may be governed under the existing FDA regulatory framework. Foster Institutional Plasticity: Evolve institutions like the FDA and EMA to accommodate quantum technologies.
doctors would want to see increased oversight in terms of regulatory actions that could increase their trust in adopting AI tools — such as oversight from the FDA, the top-ranked regulatory action noted in the survey among nearly one-half for “first” and by another 18% for “second” regulatory desire. First, U.S.
On the supply side of health care and especially public-sector health care services and public health systems and information, I publish this post on a day when major cuts to the CDC, the FDA, and other health agencies are announced.
The practicality I’ve noticed over the years is that no matter what we aim at, there’s the very severe, shorter-term FDA trial. GC: It has piqued my interest for many years. If you look at gene therapies, I’ve been kind of a vocal opponent and advocate of gene therapies for rare diseases.
In this Rise of the Medical Machines, the major risks for health care organizations were that, 68% of health care deployments had more than 10 FDA recalls. . “During the chaos and confusion, threat actors launched cyberattacks,” Ordr observed in the wake of the public health crisis.
By Aparajita Lath. The Truth Pill , authored by Dinesh Thakur and Prashant Reddy , is a monumental work that convincingly shows that drug regulation is but a myth in India. In their investigative style, the authors explain drug regulation in India through the lens of history, both Indian and global.
In December 2022, the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 formally ended the FDA’s 1938 mandate to use animal models and opened the doors for organoids to be used as a full replacement for animals in pre-clinical trials. Would they classify as a medical device or biologic under FDA guidelines, or perhaps as a combination product?
Food & Drug Administration (FDA) encouraged several states to adopt policies that prioritized race or ethnicity in the allocation of monoclonal antibody treatments and oral antivirals for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. By James Lytle. Recent guidance from the U.S.
I think that regardless of how ambitious you are, you need to play by the FDA rules and ensure complete compliance with the established clinical pathways. Some of these targets are also implicated in several hallmarks of aging, so I do hope that these drugs will work in aging as well.
The FDA’s approval of the first therapy to treat Alzheimer’s Disease in over twenty years brought attention to a not-yet-convened debate of U.S. The FDA regulatory process and aftermath. health care costs and spending, innovation, and return-on-the-investment (as well as “for whom” do the returns accrue).
Apple has progressed its digital health innovations for cardio fitness as an indicator of overall health, with high and low heart rate notifications, the ECG app coupled with the Apple Watch, irregular rhythm notifications, and an FDA-cleared AFib History feature.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is now top of mind for lawyers, scholars, policymakers, and the public. State pharmaceutical bans and restrictions — which are often medically unnecessary and instead based largely on policymakers’ moral and political views — impede the FDA’s mandate to protect and promote the public health.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For example, physicians and companies offering cytoplasmic and mitochondrial transfer have received Untitled Letters from the FDA. After receiving the letters, these individuals and entities have ceased to provide these techniques in the United States.
By Nikhil Chaudhry and Reshma Ramachandran Earlier this month, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that it had successfully included a reasonable pricing provision in a $326M investment contract with Regeneron for development of a next generation monoclonal antibody therapy for COVID-19.
FDA-cleared, the “button” is streamlined as a “stick it and forget it” medical device that can gathered up to 30-days’ worth of vital signs on the patient to whom the device is “stuck.” The BioIntelliSense device garnered a CES 2021 innovation award.
artwork by Daiara Tukano by Daiara Tukano and Maria Fernanda Gebara Last June, we had the honor of speaking at Law and Policy of Psychedelic Medicine, the 2024 Annual Conference hosted by the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School. You can watch our panel here.
The Pew Trusts recently discussed prospects for the FDA to regulate AI in health care. Scaling and continuous feedback, continuing to adapt the models based on real-life experience that might have been overlooked in the original design.
Schedule 3 drugs must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA,) prescribed by a doctor, and distributed by a pharmacy. Congress must specify that FDA’s jurisdiction over cannabis should be no more than that over alcohol and designate cannabis in food as “generally recognized as safe.” Victoria Litman M.Div, J.D.,
Note: FDA approval for at least one indication is necessary for other “off-label” uses of the drug. You need one FDA approval to open the door to other off-label uses. Remember — no other psychedelic is FDA-approved ( yet ). However, the U.S. none can ( legally ) provide psilocybin, LSD, or MDMA ( yet ).
Without Chevron deference, how will agencies relying on scientific expertise, like the FDA, CDC, and NOAA, function? Indeed, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf appears to be on nail-biting watch. Indeed, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf appears to be on nail-biting watch. Current predictions from court-watchers are dire.
The American booster push was controversial, because the scientific evidence on the need for and effectiveness of boosters was limited, and the White House exerted an unprecedented level of pressure on the FDA and CDC’s ‘independent’ scientific review processes. Ultimately, both the FDA and CDC gave their blessing to boosters.
These sites include those under the Department of Health and Human Services umbrella including the NIH and the FDA — the latter of which informs us every day on food safety issues — say, eggs, milk, produce, and deli meats all of which have been top-of-mind in recent months.
artwork by Daiara Tukano by Daiara Tukano and Maria Fernanda Gebara Last June, we had the honor of speaking at Law and Policy of Psychedelic Medicine, the 2024 Annual Conference hosted by the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School. You can watch our panel here.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to terminate pregnancy through 70 days gestationto remain widely available without the reimposition of restrictions on its access. Importantly, however, a ruling on standing only means that these particular plaintiffs lacked standing to sue the FDA. About the author Allison M.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content