This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By Donrich Thaldar On the issue of human genome editing (HGE), attitudes between bioethics scholars and the general public diverge, as highlighted by my team’s findings from a recent deliberative public engagement study. ” (Not one study participant relied on this objection during the more than 20 hours of deliberations.)
As a result of my personal experiences and my professional background as a Professor of Law and Bioethics at Case Western Reserve University, I wrote a book called Aging with a Plan: How a Little Thought Today Can Vastly Improve Your Tomorrow. In this article, I discuss the legal documents that every American adult should have.
They completed a postdoctoral fellowship in the Department of Bioethics at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and received their PhD in Comparative Literature from the University of Pennsylvania. She has authored numerous peer-reviewed articles and chapters on mental health and the training of clinicians.
Regulatory and patent exclusivity periods govern the timing of generic entry, and because market share and revenue is often quickly lost upon market entry of generic drugs, extending market exclusivity for any duration can be extremely profitable. Glenn Cohen’s Health Law Policy, Bioethics, and Biotechnology Workshop at HLS.
This article explores the legal framework surrounding these practices, emphasizing case law, Federal law, and institutional policies while calling for systemic reform to secure equal protection for all patients from all unwanted and non-consensual intimate encounters before, during, and after elective medical procedures.
These five students are a fantastic cohort of health law policy, biotechnology, and bioethics scholars who join us from across Harvard. Sarah Gabriele is a second year Master of Bioethics candidate at Harvard Medical School. We are excited to welcome a new group of Student Fellows to the Petrie-Flom Center family. Louis (USA).
The study engaged a diverse group of 30 South Africans in three evenings of deliberations on the governance of HHGE. We analyze this question from a legal perspective in this article.) As a participant stated during a plenary session, the South African government should develop a policy for HHGE “that’s more imaginative.”
Many governments have welcomed Ukrainian pets with or without their owners, and without documentation, rabies vaccine, and/or microchip. For example, Article 53 of Geneva Convention IV prohibits the destruction by the occupying power of private and public properties, except in cases of absolute military necessity.
While his friend did not win his race, William Weld did win the governor’s post and Abner joined State government under Weld. He ended up working in Massachusetts State government for about 15 years. That name captures the aspirational view that we are connected.”.
The federal government did not challenge this decision and instead amended the law in 2021 to expand access to MAID to individuals whose deaths are not reasonably foreseeable. The laws put vulnerable persons at risk and may contravene Article 10 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Canada has ratified.
There is no specific regulation governing such research in the U.S.; it’s just that the federal government won’t fund the research. This article is lightly edited and reprinted, with permission, from the American Council on Science and Health. The original article can be found here. To date, most, if not all, U.S.
This post is an adaptation of an article published in the Harvard Social Impact Review. healthcare system, representing just one example of “healthcare federalism” — the division of power between the federal and state governments in the regulation of health care. By Allison M. On June 24, 2022, the U.S. After Dobbs , U.S.
federal government’s oversight wheels began to grind into a different gear, signaling that they did not like that a Chinese firm was gaining such access to U.S. Following a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the government mandated that iCarbonX divest its ownership in PLM. But the U.S.
As scholars, we grapple with the question of what happens once the right to health is constitutionalized and whether it has a transformative effect on the economy, government funding, and the material reality people face in struggling health care systems.
This article explains how these injustices are likely to be exacerbated by the Dobbs ruling. As noted by several scholars, the Dobbs decision will have impacts on laws governing areas other than reproductive rights. Additionally, pregnant immigrants have faced additional structural barriers to accessing necessary abortion care.
Professional Regulation The Guardians of Professional Knowledge Early in the second Trump administration, health information started to disappear from government websites including those maintained by the CDC and NIH. Both tort law and evidence have long acknowledged that knowledge communities are not monolithic.
With my ongoing focus on social determinants and drivers of health for health equity and access, the first essay that caught my attention is on Government Obligations and the Negative Right to a Healthy Urban Environment. The authors are affiliated with Case Western Reserve with interests in bioethics and medicine.
This article will focus on one such book, Lessons from the COVID War: An Investigative Report. Their COVID War The “ COVID Crisis Group ” is an establishment group of businesspeople and government officials plus some subject matter experts. Produced by an eminently established collection of people, The COVID Crisis Group.
However, in the EU specific regulations influence their governance where reproductive technologies are allowed: Article 3(2)(c) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibits making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain.
In full disclosure, last year when this issue was being curated, I was part of a team that proposed to submit an article for the publication, but our submission was not accepted]. In the article to which this assertion ties , Harris Meyer talks about the growing push for price regulation in the U.S.
Luca Berro Pizzarossa is a British Academy International Fellow at the University of Birmingham and an Affiliated Researcher of the Global Health and Rights Project at The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School.
The “tools” stood for individual choices based on personal risk tolerance rather than elements of regulatory frameworks to be pursued by various levels of government. The White House has also been lobbied at various points by testing experts who asked the federal government to order more tests, but they were rebuffed. In the U.S.,
Beth writes that, “a whopping two-thirds of Americans now offer a thumbs-up on pharma” as the title of her article, calling out the 30-point gain from 32% in January 2020 to 62% in February 2021. The study was written up by Beth Snyder Bulik in FiercePharma.
If and when these issues return to the Supreme Court, the federal government under the second Trump Administration is unlikely to continue to defend medication abortion and EMTALA as the Biden Administration did previously. As of February 2025, the issues in both of these cases continue to be litigated in lower courts.
out of the Paris Agreement, has sent shock waves through government and civil society leaders gathered at COP29. The election of Donald J. Trump, who has called climate change a “hoax” and in his prior administration pulled the U.S. Argentina has walked away from the negotiations. Alicia Ely Yamin J.D.,
To “unlock” that value, the NHS and British government would have to collaborate with organizations — private and public — to, in the words of Todd Park, liberate the data and develop patient insights. health care system collaboration with the NHS in a post-Brexit scenario, described in this New Yorker article.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content