This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a settlement against a Southern California doctor for submitting false claims to Medicare and Medi-Cal between the years of 2011 and 2018 for drugs, procedures, services, and tests that were never administered to patients. As part of the settlement, the doctor will pay a total of more than $9.48
Rishi Shah, co-founder and former CEO of Outcome Health What You Should Know: – Three former executives of Outcome Health, a Chicago-based health tech startup, were sentenced for their roles in a massive fraud scheme that defrauded clients, lenders, and investors of an estimated $1B. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The nursing care company is accused of defrauding Medicare of millions of dollars for unnecessary and expensive therapy treatments from 2006 to 2011, according to the Wall Street Journal. Click here to read the entire article from the Wall Street Journal.
Between 2006 and 2011, the man allegedly billed Medicare for transporting kidney dialysis patients who did not medically need ambulance service. The indictment alleges that the man used a "straw" owner (someone who was not actually the owner) to fraudulently open Starcare Ambulance because he was otherwise ineligible to own the company.
The Vermont Attorney General followed suit with a similar action against Health Net in 2011 that was settled for $55,000, and Indiana brought a civil action against Wellpoint Inc. in 2011 that was settled for $100,000. The Connecticut Attorney General was the first to exercise this right in 2010 against Health Net Inc. million 78.8
This accusation comes after the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) conducted an audit of claims from July 2007 to March 2011. Indest III, J.D., The audit allegedly found that the home health care company was overpaid for services that were not covered by Medicaid, according to the Sun Sentinel.
The providers were accused of defrauding Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE by performing unnecessary and improperly supervised procedures from 2007 until 2011. Indest III, J.D., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law A group of Florida radiation oncology service providers settled a whistleblower or qui tam lawsuit for $3.5
1,500,000 Settlement 2012 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee $1,500,000 Settlement 2012 Phoenix Cardiac Surgery $100,000 Settlement 2012 The Hospice of Northern Idaho $50,000 Settlement 2011 Cignet Health of Prince George’s County $4,300,000 Civil Monetary Penalty 2011 General Hospital Corp. &
Federal court records from August 13, 2012, show that a former Florida Hospital employee faces fraud-conspiracy charges after he illegally accessed patient records in a solicitation scheme, according to the Orlando Sentinel. When the news broke about a privacy breach at Florida Hospital back in October of 2011, we wrote about this incident.
She made more than $400,000 in false claims between January 2008 and June 2011. Edna Lorraine Watkins, the owner of Homecare Unlimited, LLC, in Jacksonville, Florida, has been sentenced to six years in prison for defrauding Medicaid, according to the Florida Office of the Attorney General (AG). Watkins was sentenced on April 2, 2013.
The woman was arrested for allegedly stealing money from 11 clients in 2010 and 2011. Investigation by the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) Led to Arrest. To see the press release from the AG, click here.
The verdict comes from a complex scheme in which referring physicians received substantial kickbacks for services over a three-year period from 2008 to 2011. Details of the Complex Fraud Scheme. Indest III, J.D., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law On April 14, 2016, a jury in California awarded Aetna Inc. more than $37.4
For example, the Administrative Requirements (Part 162) helped reduce insurance fraud and accelerated eligibility inquiries, authorization requests, and claims processing. Only one penalty was issued in each of 2008 and 2009, 2 in 2010, 3 in 2011, and 6 in 2012.
Salud Family Health said affected employees and patients have been offered free credit monitoring and identity fraud protection services, and security policies and procedures are being reviewed and will be updated to protect against future cyberattacks. New York-Presbyterian Hospital Discovers Breach Affecting up to 12,000 Patients.
The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) resolved allegations that, from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016, Dr. Pandya violated the FCA when they submitted false claims to Federal health care programs for medically unnecessary cataract extraction surgeries and YAG laser capsulotomies (“Civil Settlement Agreement”).
Verisys’ former VP of Pharma and Pharmacy Solutions, Joe Thompson, shared a prime example of how speaker programs introduce risk to the pharmaceutical company: “In 2011, one of the most prominent endocrinologists in my sales region was an active speaker for my previous company. He led multiple programs for us each year.
Medicare has a plethora of misaligned financial incentives that work to increase costs for taxpayers and beneficiaries, and create challenges related to fraud and abuse. percent from 2011-2016, from $17.6 Less than two-tenths of one percent of Medicare’s one billion annual claims are reviewed for program integrity issues.
hospitalizations and emergency department visits) and to audit Medicare claims to assess potential fraud. The Act’s health care offset title includes Section 4163, which extends the 2% Budget Control Act of 2011 Medicare sequester for six months into FY 2032 and lowers the payment reduction percentages in FYs 2030 and 2031.
2023) ( Buckman preemption barred MDL asserting fraud on EPA), cert. Since the FDA requires pre-approval of any warnings about off-label uses, preemption at some point should have been pre-ordained under the Mensing ( 2011+1 ) independence principle, but off-label use did not really figure in Zofran ’s analysis. Monsanto Co. ,
The logic of the consumer fraud claim made no sense. Letting plaintiffs use RICO (or the False Claims Act) to bring fraud on the FDA claims (preemption only applies to state law) is a distinct minority position, but the Ninth Circuit has. In Shikada , the ultimate result was a nuclear penalty of over $800 million.
Not a single state, including Pennsylvania, allows recover of medical monitoring for “breach of warranty or fraud or violation of consumer protection statutes,” and Valsartan doesn’t cite any precedent for its contrary conclusion. 2023 WL 1818922, at *36. Rohm & Haas Co. , 3d 255, 268 (3d Cir. 2023 WL 1818922, at *35.
Nonetheless, the Ninth Circuit’s PATDC82 I allowed a RICO claim alleging that, between 1999 and 2011, defendants concealed that risk from the FDA and that, as a result, every TPP in the country paid for Actos prescriptions that it otherwise would not have reimbursed. The federal rules don’t treat fraud that way. 1 (highlights).
Criticizing attempts to sue publishers of scientific content, here in 2011, and again, here in 2013. Scientific literature about the risks and benefits of prescription medical products does not – at least in the absence of academic fraud such as the actual falsification of data (see, here ) – subject the speaker to tort liability.
470 (1996), was decided – removing express preemption as a defense for manufacturers of §510(k) products So defendants moved on fraud on the FDA under an implied preemption theory and won. Bartlett , 570 U.S. 472 (2013), implied preemption decisions, cited only by the dissent in Wyeth v. Levine , 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and rated only a “ cf.
223, 231-33 (2011), holding that the Vaccine Act preempted all design defect claims asserted by claimants who rejected Vaccine Act awards and sought to litigate their claims instead. The Supreme Court did its part in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC , 562 U.S. Now comes DeCostanzo v. Olin Corp. , 3d 148, 154 (2d Cir. 300aa-22(b)(1).
Plaintiff had the device implanted in 2011 and explanted more than seven years later, apparently not because of any symptoms or known injury. Obviously, under Buckman direct fraud-on-the-FDA claims, however titled, are impliedly preempted. The facts of Garcia are sparse. 2022 WL 4536240, *1.
Here, Plaintiffs fail to supply factual support showing Defendant acted with “oppression, fraud, or malice,” relying instead upon conclusory allegations. 2011 WL 2149095, at *5 (N.D. May 31, 2011). “[I]n the actions or omissions of the defendant demonstrate malice or aggravated or egregious fraud. Burlington Insurance Co.
A federal court applying Florida law has refused to dismiss fraud and misrepresentation claims brought by a patient against a medical-device manufacturer, rejecting the manufacturer’s contention that such claims are categorically barred by the learned-intermediary doctrine. 2011 WL 3583743, at *5 (S.D. Ethicon, Inc., Devices Rep.
Rather, parents filed class actions alleging that the smaller dose and higher priced “infants” version of OTC acetaminophen-based pain relievers, when compared to the “children’s” version with the same formula, violated Illinois and Texas consumer fraud statutes. Section 379r(a)(2). That was not always the case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content