This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Analyzing EHR-related medical malpractice claims that closed between 2010 and 2018, The Doctors Company uncovered that the pace of these claims tripled, growing from […]. The article Electronic Health Record Data Show Concerns Continue Over Injury Claims appeared first on electronichealthreporter.com.
On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). This will not affect the purpose of the federal government's clearing house for disciplinary and malpractice information, but will forever change how the information is disseminated.
That started us thinking about other uses of severance of non-indispensable parties to preserve diversity – particularly, as in the Rejuvenate case, medical malpractice defendants in product liability litigation – to preserve federal diversity jurisdiction. We most recently returned to this issue here , where we discussed Sullivan v.
2010); Baker v. 1991); In re All Pending Chinese Drywall Cases , 2010 WL 7378659, at *9-10 (Va. March 29, 2010). 2010); Duncan v. Delaware : Merganthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America , 480 A.2d 2d 647, 651 (Del. 1984); M.G. Dupont Hospital for Children , 393 F. 884, 892-93 & n.7 Croda, Inc. Georgia : Cure v.
It is not like a malpractice claim over a sponge left in a patient during surgery. It also played out some recurring themes in these cases and presented a quirk of Illinois law we have not discussed much previously. We have railed against res ipsa in mesh and other device cases before.
They’re experienced at what they do and aren’t intimidated by plaintiffs’ counsel and their threats of malpractice claims if they don’t testify the way plaintiffs want them to. procedure that existed at the time of [plaintiff’s] injury”; malpractice was “intervening cause”) (applying Kansas law); Eck v. at 1233 (citation omitted).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content