This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Though the government has learnt lessons in the past, and though it has codified some aspects of these lessons into our laws and policies relating to publichealth, it has always used a disease lens in the application of the lessons learned as opposed to a human rights lens.
To design systems and policies that promote the right to health, a holistic and proactive approach is needed, one in which people, institutions, and corporations have a shared responsibility in promoting physical, mental, and social well-being. healthcare system. First, while the U.S. COVID-19 and the U.S.
Three-quarters of Americans believe that hospitals, clinics and physicians should look beyond patients medical/clinical needs into root causes like access to healthy food, transportation, and safe/clean housing — the social determinants of health.
The spending typically includes charity care — broadly defined as free or discounted care to eligible patients. But it can also include underpayments from publichealth plans, as well as the costs of training medical professionals and doing research.
By Elizabeth Weeks The most promising path forward in publichealth is to continue recognizing federal authority and responsibility in this space. Historically, publichealth law primacy resides with states via their core, Tenth Amendment reserved police powers to address residents’ health, safety, and welfare.
The latest round of rules and legislation comes as the ACA — passed in 2010 — is now cemented in the system. The real fight comes down to defining “short-term,” said John McDonough, a professor of publichealth practice at the Harvard T.H.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 26,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content