2007 Informed Consent Malpractice 
Drug & Device Law
AUGUST 8, 2022
Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. 23 in its current form. 471 (11th Cir. 2d 775, 799 & n.114
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 6, 2022
They’re experienced at what they do and aren’t intimidated by plaintiffs’ counsel and their threats of malpractice claims if they don’t testify the way plaintiffs want them to. procedure that existed at the time of [plaintiff’s] injury”; malpractice was “intervening cause”) (applying Kansas law); Eck v. 2007 WL 2526402, at *3 (D.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content