Remove 2006 Remove FDA Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring – Not for the Faint-of-Heart (Pun Intended)

Healthcare IT Today

Moreover, the market for FDA-approved BP monitoring solutions that encourage routine measurements is well into the billions [ 22 , 23 ]. For some R&D efforts, the answer is quite simple – FDA approval has simply not been achievable due to the inability to pass critical performance standards.

FDA 122
article thumbnail

Understanding the 2025 Medicare Part D Re-design: What You Need to Know

Innovaare Compliance

These changes mark a pivotal shift from its original structure in 2006. 6] A compound drug not approved by the FDA under a New Drug Application or Biological License Application does not meet the definition of an applicable drug and will not be eligible for Part D. Rebates from the selected drugs may change.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary 4 | Monthly Update 2021

SQA

The new regulation, RDC 478/2021 , repeals economic monitoring and reporting processes previously established under RDC 185/2006, and initially reduces the number of medical device types for which economic monitoring will be required. FDA plant inspection and pay $50 million in fines and forfeiture.

article thumbnail

Health Provider News

Hall Render

Vincent Named President of the Association of Black Cardiologists Arkansas Children’s Hires Morse as Chief Administrator for ACNW Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals partners raise $5.4 operating income, 4.1% operating income, 4.1%

article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

But in prescription medical product liability litigation, products must receive FDA approval, clearance or other authorization (hereafter, collectively referred to as “approval” for short) before they can be marketed. Are manufacturers liable only for failing to employ an alternative design that the FDA has approved for distribution. . .

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Comment K, Presumptions, and Medical Device Design Defects Under Texas Law

Drug & Device Law

2006) (reversal concerned warning issues); Blackmon v. Texas, unlike most states, enforces a strong statutory presumption that prescription medical product warnings complying with FDA requirements imposed by “pre-market approval or licensing of the product” are adequate as a matter of law. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. 3d 364 (5th Cir.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Dobbs Would Likely Have Significant Impacts On Drug And Device Companies

Drug & Device Law

2012), addressed a challenge to the application of Idaho’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to criminalize the use of an FDA-approved abortifacient medication obtained through an internet prescription and mailed to the plaintiff from out of state. As we discussed here , McCormack v. Hiedeman, 694 F.3d 3d 1004 (9th Cir.

FDA 127