Remove 2005 Remove FDA Remove Governance
article thumbnail

How the Medical Industry Can Help Combat the Current Coronavirus Crisis

Exeed Regulatory Compliance

FDA Guidance on EUA, Jan 2017 *Notes: Section 564 as in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C Act); PAHPRA refers to the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2015 One area of current concern is the lack of diagnostic testing capability in the US to rapidly detect and confirm new cases.

article thumbnail

Can Children Consent to the COVID Vaccine? The Case of Foster Care and Juvenile Justice

Bill of Health

Some children may be unvaccinated by no choice of their own, but instead because of decisions made by parents, guardians, or state or local government officials. 325, 338 (2005). [21] In this post, I argue that young people should have the opportunity to consent to vaccines. Barnette , 319 U.S. 624, 63 S.Ct.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Health-Heavy State of the Union

Kaiser Health News

Biden’s calls for bipartisanship to extend health programs like pandemic-era subsidies for Affordable Care Act health plans are expected to clash with conservative demands to slash federal government spending. Rovner: Sarah, is the FDA worried about this case? They said they don’t think that would help.

article thumbnail

Federal Officer Removal Fails In California

Drug & Device Law

Put simply, among the morass of Medicare are provisions governing Medicare Advantage programs, which companies can elect to provide and eligible people can elect to receive. 308 (2005), which comes up not infrequently in drug and device product liability cases. Darue Eng’g & Mfg. ,

article thumbnail

Dealing with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Non-Decision on Standards Compliance Evidence

Drug & Device Law

That is significant because, unlike (now) every other state in the country, since 1987 Pennsylvania precedent prohibited defendants from introducing evidence of their compliance with government and/or industry standards (“standards compliance” or “compliance” evidence, for short) in strict liability design defect cases – generally.

article thumbnail

PMA Preemption Decision Slides to the Bottom of the “Parallel Claim” Slippery Slope

Drug & Device Law

312 (2008), that essentially all product liability claims against manufacturers of FDA pre-market approved (“PMA”) medical devices were preempted. at 349 (“The FDCA leaves no doubt that it is the Federal Government rather than private litigants who are authorized to file suit for noncompliance”). Medtronic, Inc. ,

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Logical Contradiction Doctrine:  Buckman for Textualists

Drug & Device Law

470 (1996), was decided – removing express preemption as a defense for manufacturers of §510(k) products So defendants moved on fraud on the FDA under an implied preemption theory and won. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S. Mensing , 564 U.S. Mensing , 564 U.S. Lohr , 518 U.S.

FDA 72